杏吧原创

It’s a dirty old world

Purists won't be pleased, but trading the right to pollute is the way to save the planet, says Franz-Josef Radermacher

The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy for the 21st Century by Sebastian Oberth眉r and Hermann Ott, Springer-Verlag, DM98, ISBN 354066470X

IT鈥橲 one thing working out whether, how and why the Earth鈥檚 climate is changing. It鈥檚 quite another to work out what to do about it. Decisions have to be taken before all the evidence is in to forestall possible disasters鈥攕uch as massive crop failure. These decisions have to be taken internationally, wresting agreement from hundreds of competing positions and interests, not least because our climate does not recognise national borders.

Kyoto, Japan, was the venue for the 20th century鈥檚 last major international climate agreement in November 1997. In The Kyoto Protocol, Sebastian Oberth眉r and Hermann Ott of the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy in Germany make the international climate negotiations understandable, and at times even like a political thriller. One of the most far-reaching international contracts ever developed emerged from Kyoto. That contract introduced some challenging new instruments for dealing with topics of global concern.

The authors have been involved in this process for many years, so they can give an insider鈥檚 picture. The diplomatic process in Kyoto involved鈥攁nd its essential follow-up involves鈥攖housands of people worldwide from governments, science and lobbying groups. Detailed reports of negotiating meetings may not seem promising material for a gripping book鈥攂ut so much was at stake here that drama was unavoidable.

In part, agreement was reached through diplomatic brinkmanship. The authors vividly describe how the Chair pesented the parties to the talks with last-minute draft agreements which became, given the pressure from outside the meeting, offers they couldn鈥檛 refuse.

The introduction of a number of innovative instruments into international policy-making also played a major role in bringing about agreement. One was the concept of 鈥渆missions trading鈥 in which countries with higher carbon dioxide outputs can buy the right to emit more, from countries emitting less. Another instrument is the Clean Development Mechanism that could ideally reward countries funding clean technologies in developing countries.

The weakness of this book is the underlying critical tone it adopts towards such instruments. The authors describe them using phrases such as 鈥渂uying ourselves free鈥濃攚hich reflect the view of some, mainly European, environmental groups and Green parties that the developed world must reduce its CO2 and other emissions immediately. According to this view, emissions trading is at root an immoral attempt by the developed world, particularly the US, to go on gas-guzzling. Such a view, if translated into policy, would make it very difficult indeed to achieve the consensus with the US that will allow something to be done to avert the probable dangers of climate change.

The authors favour domestic measures by the industrialised countries. But to me it makes no economic sense to make domestic cuts to CO2 emissions when international measures such as emissions trading offer the opportunity to achieve a slowdown in global warming and social development in the less developed world. The urgent need for climate policy makes us understand that we now all inhabit one world. This fact is a consequence of modern information and communication technology as much as global environmental issues. We will have to deal with issues like equal per-capita emission rights, the idea that countries should reduce emissions on a per capita basis. This may be an easier concept for scientists to grasp than for politicians.

Unlike the moralist-environmentalists, I believe these rights should be tradable. Tradability will allow us to couple the international climate regime to the World Trade Organization and its mechanisms for ensuring individual countries鈥 compliance. This will help us finally to begin building a sustainable global governance system (New 杏吧原创, 4 December 1999, p3). That process will start with the integration of the present regimes for the economic, environmental and social fields into a workable whole.

More from New 杏吧原创

Explore the latest news, articles and features