HOW much damage does cosmic radiation do to frequent flyers? Is depleted uranium from shells causing cancers in former war zones such as Kosovo and Iraq? Is enough being done to protect people from natural radon gas? The discovery that certain kinds of radiation leave a distinctive pattern of damage in our cells could help answer these questions.
鈥淚f this works, we鈥檒l be able to take a measurement and see the lifetime exposure in that person,鈥� says David Brenner of Columbia University in New York. 鈥淥ften there is no other reliable record of individual exposure.鈥� It is this uncertainty about radiation exposure that makes it hard to pin down the health risks.
鈥淭hat they found this effect was there at all is significant,鈥� says Michael Cornforth, a radiation biologist at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston. 鈥淏ut I was flabbergasted by how clear-cut it was.鈥�
Advertisement
Radiation is harmful because of its ionising effect, which can break DNA chains. If the broken pieces are rejoined incorrectly, the resulting genetic scrambling can harm cells or, far worse, set them on the road to cancer.
Some genetic damage is easy to spot, such as when parts of different chromosomes are exchanged 鈥� known as interchromosomal changes. But because mutagenic chemicals can also cause such exchanges, this is not a reliable indicator of exposure to radiation.
Researchers have long suspected that slow-moving, heavy particles such as alpha particles and neutrons should leave a characteristic pattern of damage. These kinds of radiation are known as 鈥渄ensely ionising鈥� because they wreak havoc within a short tunnel; 鈥渟parsely ionising鈥� X-rays or gamma rays spread their damage along a much longer path. Because the damage from densely ionising radiation is so concentrated, it is far more likely to hit one chromosome several times, triggering deletions or reordering of its DNA.
Detecting intrachromosomal changes like these has been extremely difficult till now. But Brenner鈥檚 team, together with a Russian group, took advantage of new dyes to 鈥減aint鈥� bands on chromosomes. Image analysis software translates this into false-colour pictures (see Graphic), making it easy to spot any rearrangements.
The team used the technique to analyse chromosome 5 in thousands of blood cells from 31 people who had worked at a secret nuclear weapons facility near Ozyorsk in Russia. Though most of the workers were last exposed to densely ionising radiation from plutonium over 10 years ago, the team found a surprising amount of damage. Nearly 4 per cent of blood cells in highly exposed workers had rearrangements within chromosome 5. Extrapolating from this, Brenner thinks that 62 per cent of these workers鈥� blood cells have damage within at least one chromosome.
Workers with moderate levels of exposure had a lower level of damage, while those with no radiation exposure had none. Even workers at a nuclear reactor exposed to high levels of sparsely ionising gamma rays and mutating chemicals had very few intrachromosomal changes, though they had significant interchromosomal damage (The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol 72, p 1162).
There is still a lot of work to do before the technique can be widely adopted. 鈥淲e need to automate the technique,鈥� Brenner says. 鈥淓ven in this small study, it took us 2 years to look at all the cells.鈥�