FEEDBACK is thoroughly in favour of honest labelling. So we are delighted with the product that Lyn Hoare obtained: a 125-millilitre aerosol of from Boots The Chemists. The blurb on the can reminds us that 鈥淪ensitive skin needs extra care throughout the day, which is why this gentle facial spritz is specially formulated to refresh and hydrate.鈥 Lovely. How does it work? 鈥淗ypoallergenic and fragrance-free, it instantly cools and freshens skin, helping protect it from the drying effects of central heating and air conditioning. Lanolin free. Dermatologically tested.鈥
All these claims are incontestably true: Hoare was astonished to read that the can contains just one thing 鈥 鈥渁qua鈥, which is ingredient-speak for water. She is just glad that it was a free gift from the shop. Paying 拢3.99 for an aerosol can of water seems somewhat excessive. In future she鈥檚 going to fill a pump dispenser from the tap.
Advertisement
THERE Martin Horwood was, sitting at his computer, when the calendar window of his Microsoft Outlook office program started scrolling uncontrollably back through time. He watched, helpless, as it zoomed back through two world wars, past the Great Reform Act of 1832, the French revolution and American independence 鈥 stopping only in the 1760s when, he guesses, a frantic IT worker somewhere in the bowels of the famous London building he works in must have fixed the network glitch.
Naturally, Horwood was intrigued to see how far back in time he could personally make Outlook鈥檚 calendar go. Trying to view even earlier dates, he got stuck at All Fool鈥檚 day 1601. Putting this into a famous web search engine revealed no special event in history that day. It did, however, provide a link to a 鈥渞ather weird鈥 website devoted to the work of a genealogist named John Mayer at . This notes that 鈥淥utlook provides a series of perpetual calendars covering something less than 2898 years, from 1 April 1603 to 29 August 4500,鈥 but that users can manually scroll back to 1601.
Feedback鈥檚 further searches suggest that 1 April 1601 was declared the beginning of time by the authors of the COBOL computer-programming language beloved of banks 鈥 who are presumably not that interested in pre-capitalist dates. And with that we return to our allotted task of gathering further trivia, while Martin Horwood MP returns to his of representing the citizens of Cheltenham in the famous building called the House of Commons.
ANOTHER quantum sign (Feedback, 7 July). Tim Gomersall and Jerry Huxtable both report seeing a sign in France that raises interesting dimensional and philosophical issues. In the centre of the town of Moutiers there is a signpost that points in two directions. One points to the right and says 鈥淭outes directions鈥. The other points to the left and says 鈥淎utres directions鈥. If all directions are covered by the first one, Gomersall argues, how can there be other directions left over for the second?
In addition, Gomersall reports that when he was skiing in the Alps he saw, on the middle of a piste in Meribel, a signpost marked only 鈥淎ttention: Signe鈥. This had been thoughtfully translated underneath as 鈥淒anger: Sign鈥 for the seasonal anglophone population of the valley.
鈥淭HE postcard from NASA鈥檚 Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California that Kathlyn Powell received announced 鈥淛uly 鈥 Public Lectures on Mars鈥. She wonders how well attended they were鈥
Given that there appeared to be no risks to skiers in the vicinity apart from running into the sign itself, this struck Gomersall as a fine example of something creating its own purpose.
FINALLY, we stated on 30 June that several readers had sent us what appeared to be a photograph of a sign outside Northampton General Hospital saying 鈥淔amily Planning Advice 鈥 use rear entrance鈥. We appealed to readers to help us decide whether the photo was genuine or a fake.
Things still aren鈥檛 totally certain. One reader wrote to say: 鈥淚 was born and raised in Northampton, and can verify the existence of the sign. Given its advice, though, it鈥檚 amazing that I was born at all.鈥
However, Theo Fenton tells us: 鈥淭he public relations department at Northampton General Hospital (NGH) issued the following statement to its employees: 鈥業 am sure many of you will be aware of a spoof NGH directional sign for a family planning clinic that is being widely circulated via email and the internet. Although it is amusing, it is a hoax. We do not provide a family planning clinic at NGH.'鈥
A spokesperson for Northampton General Hospital confirms that such a memo was indeed sent out last year, so on balance it looks like the hoax theory is right. Meanwhile, Fenton and several other readers tell us that there is a sign 鈥渢hat really might exist鈥 at Southampton General Hospital reading 鈥淢aternity Department 鈥 Deliveries at Rear鈥. So now we want to know: does that one exist or not?