杏吧原创

Bioscience journals ‘too dry’ say linguists

When it comes to language, biomedical journals are a sensory wasteland devoid of words that engage the senses, an analysis finds

TALK about dry. Have you ever thought that reading biomedical journals is like 鈥渁 long journey through a colourless, flat terrain devoid of prominent features鈥?

That鈥檚 the conclusion of a linguistic study by Raul Rodriguez-Esteban of Columbia University in New York and Andrey Rzhetsky at the University of Chicago. They compared the occurrence of sensory words 鈥 such as those for colours and textures 鈥 in 78 journals with language used by Reuters news service, Wikipedia, Edgar Allan Poe, William Shakespeare and Walt Whitman.

Whitman and Reuters came top, while the journals only managed about one-fifth of their score (The EMBO Journal, ).

Rzhetsky says using more sensory words would make biomedical papers easier to understand. Peter Griffiths of the Plain English Campaign agrees: 鈥淚f you get the senses involved, it tends to make things much clearer.鈥

鈥淯sing more sensory words would make biomedical papers easier to understand鈥

However, Athar Yawar, a senior editor at The Lancet, thinks that any change would require a rethink of scientific method to incorporate sensory experience as well as its usual abstract concepts.

More from New 杏吧原创

Explore the latest news, articles and features