
From now on Pluto wonât just be any dwarf planet, it will be a âplutoid.â
The International Astronomical Union (IAU) today after two years of deliberation. The new classification will be used to refer to bright dwarf planets that spend the bulk of their time outside Neptuneâs orbit.
So far, Pluto and its larger neighbour, Eris, are the only named objects that qualify as plutoids, but more dwarf planets are expected to follow.
Advertisement
In 2006, IAU members voted to demote Pluto from planet to âdwarf planetâ, defined as an object large enough for gravity to make round, but not big enough to clear out its orbit.
At the same time, they also voted to come up with an alternate name for similar, Pluto-like objects. The name âplutoidâ was chosen partly in deference to Plutoâs fallen glory.
âIn the end, we ended up with something Pluto-like, and I donât think we could have done better,â IAU general secretary Karel A van der Hucht, told New ĐÓ°ÉÔ´´.
But the name is not universally loved. âIt sounds like âhemorrhoidâ and it sounds like âasteroidâ, and of course these objects are planets and not asteroids,â says planetary scientist Alan Stern of the University Space Research Association in Maryland, US.
Minimum brightness
Stern, who has criticised the IAUâs definition of a planet, says the naming decision was not made openly and is unlikely to carry much weight.
âI think this pronouncement is one more step in the IAUâs increasing irrelevance,â he told New ĐÓ°ÉÔ´´. âThe IAU could announce tomorrow that the sky is green, but that doesnât make it so.â
But van der Hucht says the classification is not binding. âItâs a free world,â he says. âWe do not issue laws at the IAU. This is a working recommendation that will make life easier for people in the field.â
The term âplutoidâ will not apply to all dwarf planets. Ceres, for example, which sits in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, will not be a part of this category.
âPlutoidsâ must also be a minimum brightness, a requirement that will exclude dozens of dwarf planet candidates that have been spotted in the Kuiper belt, a ring of icy objects beyond Neptune, says Michael Brown of Caltech in Pasadena, US.
âThatâs an odd definition,â Brown told New ĐÓ°ÉÔ´´. âIt makes objects of exactly the same size âplutoidsâ or ânot plutoidsâ depending on whatâs covering their surface.â If Pluto were covered with dust, Brown notes, it might not be considered a plutoid.