Few series can claim to have inspired more people to become scientists and engineers than . During its Space Race heyday, the show鈥檚 emphasis on knowledge, discovery and invention touched the imaginations of millions.
But while the Enterprise鈥榮 official mission statement begins 鈥渢o explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations鈥�, its unofficial ending is 鈥渁nd blow them up鈥�.
Advertisement
In practice, the show has often focused on crowd-pleasing action, relegating science to expository technobabble 鈥� a tendency that鈥檚 grown more pronounced as the franchise has grown more tired.
So does 鈥� fresh take on the series redress the balance?
Reboot happy
has pulled off the tricky feat of enlivening a scenario that many had dismissed as clapped-out, in a way that will satisfy all but the grouchiest of Trekkies. The casting and characterisation is immaculate; the plot and direction are engaging and fast-moving; and fans will be pleased that many familiar motifs are present and correct 鈥� it鈥檚 still , for example.
But what鈥檚 missing is a big idea. The new movie is about an epic but conceptually mundane conflict, driven by the baddy鈥檚 thirst for revenge, not the goodies鈥� hunger for knowledge. There鈥檚 only one new world and very little new life; in a telling scene, Spock rejects the Vulcan Science Academy in favour of Starfleet, which is more explicitly militaristic than in previous incarnations.
Rather, the new Star Trek continues the series鈥� habit of using the scientific trappings to dress up its fantasies. Sometimes this is dubious: a supernova endangers the entire galaxy and a black hole that, like most in fiction, behaves much like a cosmic vacuum cleaner. Another sci-fi favourite 鈥� the concept of parallel worlds 鈥� is used to cunning effect.
At other times, it鈥檚 old hat 鈥� while teleportation and time travel are still making headlines in the real world, there鈥檚 little new about their use as fictional devices in this movie.
Future tech
The technology is more plausible. The mysterious 鈥渞ed matter鈥� that the villainous Nero uses to wreak mass destruction closely parallels the (possibly equally fictional) red mercury that occasionally spooks arms-control experts.
The brain-controlling parasites that ensure his prisoners鈥� compliance have real-life counterparts, too. And we鈥檝e written before about how a stunning sequence, in which Kirk and company parachute to a planet鈥檚 surface from orbit, might soon be the ultimate extreme sport.
Ultimately, however, Star Trek was rarely at its best when it was trying to be inspirational. On the contrary, some of its clunkiest and most preachy episodes were those where it tried to address such heavyweight issues as environmentalism, technocracy and genetic inheritance.
Boldly going where many directors have gone before, Abrams manages to give this much-beloved franchise the reboot it needed.
