Water is turning up in unexpected places on the moon, controversial new observations suggest.
According to theory, water is not stable on the moon鈥檚 surface above -167 掳C. As a result, ice should be concentrated in 鈥渃old traps鈥� near the lunar poles, in craters that never get any sunlight. NASA鈥檚 LCROSS spacecraft found water when it crashed into one such crater, called Cabeus, in October.
But new observations from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) suggest that many of the permanently shadowed regions near the south pole are dry and several potentially wet regions are sunlit.
Advertisement
The observations come from the (LEND) experiment, which looks for possible water deposits by measuring neutrons emitted from the moon. Water or other hydrogen-bearing compounds reduce the number of fast neutrons.
LEND examined 37 permanently shadowed craters near the south pole and found that only three of them 鈥� Cabeus, Faustini, and Shoemaker 鈥� showed significant amounts of hydrogen. Several illuminated regions also appear to be hydrogen rich.
鈥淚 think we have a paradigm-busting set of observations here,鈥� says Jim Garvin, the chief scientist at NASA鈥檚 Goddard Space Flight Center.
Targeted search
LEND鈥檚 principal scientist, Igor Mitrofanov of the Russian Space Research Institute, reported these 鈥渘eutron suppressed regions鈥� last week at the in San Francisco.
He believes that a half-metre-thick layer of dry soil may cover a layer of dirty ice, preventing the ice from evaporating into space. He and his colleagues calculate that the icy layer, which may have been delivered to the moon by asteroids or comets, could contain concentrations of water as high as 3 to 5 per cent.
However, the new results remain controversial. The LEND instrument contains a new feature that is designed to improve its focus, so that it only picks up neutrons from a small patch of ground below it. But it has not been tested on a planetary mission before, and some researchers suspect it may be detecting neutrons from surrounding regions as well.
鈥淭here are a lot of questions about the instrument response that need to be answered,鈥� says Rick Elphic of NASA Ames Research Center. 鈥淭he jury鈥檚 still out on the validity of what they are claiming to see.鈥�
Fortunately, LRO is expected to continue gathering data for two more years, and LEND鈥檚 results will grow more accurate over time. 鈥淚 think our story will be a lot sharper by next summer,鈥� Garvin says.
