杏吧原创

Deep future: Will there be any nature left?

We are causing a mass extinction event. What species do we stand to lose in the coming millennia, and what new creatures will emerge?
We could cut our losses with some species and focus instead on creating new ecosystems
We could cut our losses with some species and focus instead on creating new ecosystems
(Image: Keren Su/Getty Images)

Read more:100,000 AD: Living in the deep future

ON THE face of it, the future of the natural world looks grim. Humans are causing a mass extinction that will be among the worst in Earth鈥檚 history. Wilderness is being razed and we are filling the air, water and land with pollution.

The bottom line is that, barring a radical shift in human behaviour, our distant descendants will live in a world severely depleted of nature鈥檚 wonders.

Biodiversity, in particular, will be hit hard. Assessments of the state of affairs make consistently depressing reading. Almost a fifth of vertebrates are classed as threatened, meaning there is a significant chance that those species will die out within 50 years.

The main cause is habitat destruction, but human-made climate change will be increasingly important. One much-discussed model estimates that between 15 and 37 per cent of species will be 鈥渃ommitted to extinction鈥 by 2050 () as a result of warming.

鈥淚t will be a new world,鈥 says at the Institute of Zoology in London, UK. The ecosystem will become much simpler, dominated by a small number of widespread, populous species. Among animals that are 鈥渋ncompatible鈥 with humans 鈥 we may like hunting them or colonising their habitat, for example 鈥 few will survive. 鈥淚 don鈥檛 have much hope for blue macaws, pandas, rhinos or tigers,鈥 Jones says.

Ultimately, though, life will recover: it always has. The mass extinctions of the past offer hints as to how the ecosystem will eventually bounce back, says , UK. The two that we know most about are the end-Permian extinction 252 million years ago, which wiped out 80 per cent of species, and the less severe end-Cretaceous extinction 65 million years ago, which famously took out the dinosaurs. The Permian extinction is more relevant because it was caused by massive global warming, but Benton cautions that the world was very different then, so today鈥檚 mass extinction will not play out in quite the same way.

Recoveries usually have two stages. If ours pans out in the same way, the first 2 to 3 million years will be dominated by fast-reproducing, short-lived 鈥渄isaster taxa鈥. These will rapidly give rise to new species and bring the world鈥檚 species count back up ().

But a lot of things will still be missing. Ecosystems will be simple, with similar species doing similar things. Herbivores will be less diverse, and top predators may be absent altogether in many places.

That鈥檚 where longer-lived, slower-evolving species come in to restore the full complexity of the ecosystem. But this can take up to 10 million years, much longer than even the most optimistic projections of the human future ().

It doesn鈥檛 have to be like that. We can take action now to get the recovery going, although we don鈥檛 know how much we can accelerate it.

Conservation biologists are increasingly thinking the unthinkable, such as relocating species to places where they can thrive while abandoning them to their fate in their native ranges.

That may seem unnatural, but given that human influence has already touched almost every ecosystem on Earth, is 鈥渘atural鈥 even a useful concept any more?

Even more radically, we might be better off encouraging the formation of new species and ecosystems rather than struggling to save existing species that have no long-term future, like pandas. 鈥淭here鈥檚 no way I鈥檇 want to get rid of them,鈥 says Jones, 鈥渂ut things do change and adapt and die.鈥

Benton says the most important thing is to . That needn鈥檛 be a gargantuan task. A recent analysis suggests that damaged wetlands can be restored within two human generations ().

Beyond that it may be possible to start 鈥渆volutionary engineering鈥. For instance we could divide a species into two separate habitats and leave them to evolve separately, or introduce 鈥渇ounder鈥 species into newly rebuilt ecosystems.

Nature may solve the problem for us by providing founder species from an unexpected source. Animals such as pigeons, rats and foxes are already flourishing alongside humans and may well give rise to new species, becoming the founders of the new ecosystem.

鈥淎nimals like pigeons, rats and foxes already flourish alongside humans and may well become the founders of a new ecosystem鈥

If you are disturbed by the prospect of a world colonised by armies of rapidly evolving rats and pigeons, look away now.

More from New 杏吧原创

Explore the latest news, articles and features