WE ALL remember dozing off during a boring class at school. A robotic teacher that monitors students鈥� attention levels and mimics the techniques human teachers use to hold their pupils鈥� attention promises to end the snoozing, especially for students who have their lessons online. Tests indicate the robot can boost how much students remember from their lessons.
Intelligent tutoring systems that use virtual teachers to interact with students could play a crucial role in the expanding field of online education. The trouble with online courses is that it is usually impossible to know whether the student is concentrating and engaging with the lesson. Unlike virtual teachers, human teachers have a series of tricks for keeping their classes focused 鈥� changing the pitch or tone of their voice, for example, or gesturing to emphasise points and engage with their audience. and Dan Szafir at the University of Wisconsin-Madison wanted to find out whether a robot could use some of the same techniques to improve how much a student retains.
鈥淲e wanted to look at how learning happens in the real world,鈥� says Mutlu. 鈥淲hat do human teachers do and how can we draw on that to build an educational robot that achieves something similar?鈥�
Advertisement
The pair programmed a to tell students a story in a one-on-one situation and then tested them afterwards to see how much they had remembered. Engagement levels were monitored using a $200 EEG sensor to monitor the FP1 area of the brain, which manages learning and concentration. When a significant decrease in certain brain signals indicated that the student鈥檚 attention level had fallen, the system sent a signal to the robot to trigger a cue. 鈥淲e can鈥檛 do it just at any given moment, we have to try and do it like human teachers do,鈥� says Mutlu.
The robot teacher first told a short story about the animals that make up the Chinese zodiac, in order to get a baseline EEG reading. Next, the robot told a longer 10-minute story based on a little-known Japanese folk tale called , which the student was unlikely to have heard before.
During this story the robot raised its voice or used arm gestures to regain the student鈥檚 attention if the EEG levels dipped. These included pointing at itself or towards the listener 鈥� or using its arms to indicate a high mountain, for example. Two other groups were tested but the robot either gave no cues, or sprinkled them randomly throughout the storytelling. Afterwards, the students were asked a few questions about the Chinese zodiac to distract them before being asked a series of questions about the folk tale.
As the team had expected, the students who were given a cue by the robot when their attention was waning were much better at recalling the story than the other two groups, answering an average of 9 out of 14 questions correctly, as compared with just 6.3 when the robot gave no cues at all. The results were presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Austin, Texas, earlier this month.
聯Students given a cue by the robot when their attention wandered recalled the story better聰
The idea of recapturing students鈥� waning attention in this way would have 鈥渟ignificant implications for the field of education鈥�, says , director of Stanford University鈥檚 Artificial Intelligence Lab in California and co-founder of online classroom . It offers free courses from Stanford, Princeton University, the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania, and has already attracted more than a million students since its launch last month.
鈥淥ne-on-one tutoring has been repeatedly shown to give dramatic results in student learning, but the main problem with it is the cost, and that it鈥檚 just difficult to scale,鈥� Ng says. 鈥淭he vision of automatically measuring student engagement so as to build a more interactive teacher is very exciting.鈥�
