Read more: 鈥Higgsteria: Hunting the world鈥檚 most wanted particle鈥
Editorial: 鈥Particle discovery is a start, not an end鈥
A NEWLY glimpsed boson is prompting celebration around the world, but the particle could yet break the model that it is credited with completing. Or so most physicists hope.
Advertisement
Although spotted at last, many properties of the new particle 鈥 thought to be the Higgs boson, or at least something similar 鈥 have yet to be tested. What鈥檚 more, the telltale signature it left in the detectors at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) does not exactly match what is predicted by the standard model of particle physics, the leading explanation for the known particles and the forces that act on them. So it is possible the new particle is something much more exotic, such as a member of a more complete model of the universe that includes the mysterious entities of dark matter and gravity. That would end the standard model鈥檚 supremacy, but it would also be a cause for even greater celebration than the discovery of the Higgs itself.
鈥淢any of my colleagues and I think that this discovery on Wednesday may mark the beginning of the end of the standard model,鈥 says of the German Electron Synchotron research centre (DESY) in Hamburg. 鈥淢aybe these little deviations from the standard model really build up to a significant deviation. Maybe once we make this more precise with more data we will see that this is not the standard-model Higgs.鈥
鈥淭his discovery may mark the beginning of the end of the standard model鈥
Rapturous applause, whistles and cheers filled the auditorium at CERN, near Geneva, Switzerland, as the heads of the twin LHC experiments presented their particle discoveries on 4 July. of CMS and Fabiola Gianotti of ATLAS both reported seeing excesses of particles that fit the profile of a Higgs, with masses of 125 and 126 gigaelectronvolts (GeV) respectively. (In particle physics energy and mass are interchangeable.)
The Higgs doesn鈥檛 just complete the standard model, it also has a key role to play in the nature of matter itself, as the fundamental component of the Higgs field. According to the standard model, all particles must pass through this omnipresent entity. Some, like the photon, slip through unhindered 鈥 they are massless. Others are slowed down, resulting in mass. 鈥淭his boson is a very profound thing,鈥 says Incandela. 鈥淚t embodies substance to all these other particles that exist.鈥
Given the rumours, leaks and hype leading up to the announcement 鈥 and the knowledge that a discovery was in principle possible given the data collected 鈥 the particle discovery was not a complete surprise. Remarkably though, ATLAS and CMS both claimed 5 sigma confidence in the result, equivalent to a 5 in 10 million chance that the readings could have been created by background processes in the detector. That exceeded the best of the anticipated outcomes. 鈥淚 think we have it,鈥 concluded Rolf-Dieter Heuer, director general of CERN.
Discussion quickly moved to what exactly 鈥渋t鈥 was. The Higgs hasn鈥檛 been glimpsed directly 鈥 but via its decay into a plethora of other particles more easily picked up by the LHC detectors.
The standard model predicts the rate at which a Higgs of a given mass should decay into these particles. But the reported rates for the new particle do not exactly match what is predicted for a mass of about 125 GeV (see diagram). The anomalies could disappear, producing a standard-model Higgs 鈥 or they could grow. Most physicists are hoping for the latter.
It is clear that the standard model is inadequate, not least because it can鈥檛 explain 80 per cent of the matter in our galaxy 鈥 dark matter 鈥 and makes no mention of gravity (See 鈥淐an we split the Higgs boson?鈥). A non-standard-model Higgs would be a big clue as to which of many proposed extensions to the standard model 鈥 if any 鈥 is a correct description of reality.
Steven Weinberg, who won a Nobel prize in 1979 for theoretical work on elementary particles, has previously said it would be a 鈥渘颈驳丑迟尘补谤别鈥 if a Higgs boson was discovered that neatly fulfilled its duties as laid out by the standard model and did nothing more. Such a particle wouldn鈥檛 give us clues about what鈥檚 next. 鈥淚t is crucial to keep looking for clues to a more comprehensive theory,鈥 he told New 杏吧原创 following the announcement.
Luckily, there are several gaps in the data presented last week that might yet turn the nightmare into a dream. Conversations with physicists from ATLAS and CMS at the (ICHEP), which kicked off in Melbourne, Australia, directly after the CERN announcement, and the flurry of papers appearing on the arxiv preprint server since the announcement, suggest that there are grounds for cautious optimism.
According to the standard model, a Higgs boson of about 125 GeV should decay into tau particles about six per cent of the time, but it seems to be doing it a lot less than that. At last week鈥檚 seminar, the CMS team reported no excess in tau production beyond what is expected due to background processes. ATLAS, meanwhile, did not release any data specifically on tau production. 鈥淚 think this is a very intriguing thing, which is perhaps trying to tell us something already,鈥 says of CMS. 鈥淚t鈥檚 sort of a really strange game that鈥檚 going on there,鈥 agrees of ATLAS. 鈥淚f that continues to be seen, it is certainly not a Higgs boson.鈥
What else would it be? Only two types of elementary particle are known to exist: fermions, which make up matter and include electrons, quarks and neutrinos; and bosons, which are force carriers and include photons and the W and Z bosons. According to the standard model, the Higgs field is responsible for the mass of all the fermions and bosons. But taus are fermions 鈥 and if the Higgs is not decaying into taus, it is probably not giving them mass either. Might the Higgs only give mass to bosons?
De Roeck thinks that might be the case. He points out that when Peter Higgs and others came up with the theory in the 1960s, the Higgs mechanism was designed only to explain the mass of the bosons. It wasn鈥檛 until later that the mechanism was extended to include all other mass-bearing particles, as a simplification, he says. 鈥淪o maybe the Higgs is doing what it should be doing.鈥
That鈥檚 interesting, because then something else is needed to give mass to fermions, a possibility that starts to sound a lot like a hypothetical but mathematically elegant extension to the standard model called supersymmetry. This theory proposes a slew of new particles and superpartners to solve several phenomena that the standard model can鈥檛 address, including dark matter and a thorny contradiction known as the hierarchy problem. Supersymmetry specifies a minimum of five Higgs bosons, plus several superpartner Higgsinos 鈥 some of these other Higgses could give fermions mass if it turns out that the boson spotted at the LHC doesn鈥檛.
See graphic: 鈥淣ew particle, new questions鈥
Many are cautious about extrapolating so much from the tau data at such an early stage. Peter Jenni, a founder and former head of ATLAS, doesn鈥檛 think it is telling us anything yet. He says bigger statistical deviations have disappeared in the past and he expects this one to as well.
But just about everyone agrees that it鈥檚 a channel to keep an eye on. 鈥淚t鈥檚 not something we鈥檙e yet making any strong statements about, but it will be something interesting to watch,鈥 Incandela said at ICHEP.
Decay data
The low tau rate wasn鈥檛 the only anomaly in the data. The CMS and ATLAS teams also reported that the new boson seems to decay into a pair of photons too frequently 鈥 about one-and-a-half times the rate predicted by the standard model (see diagram). If that trend continues, it could mean that another particle is being produced in the detectors, alongside the Higgs-like boson. That particle might be one of the other Higgs particles predicted by supersymmetry, says De Roeck, or something else.
This 鈥渄iphoton鈥 excess is extremely important, says of Zhejiang University in Hangzhou, China. 鈥淚f the current situation stays and the precision improves, I believe it will strongly imply the existence of physics beyond the standard model.鈥
Two days after the announcement, Wang鈥檚 team posted a showing that the existence of superpartners of tau particles 鈥 called 鈥渟taus鈥 鈥 could explain the diphoton excess. They show that, via a mechanism first outlined by a group based at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, these particles could cause the Higgs to produce more photons ().
It won鈥檛 be smooth sailing for the LHC experimenters, says Wang. The types of collision that occur at the LHC make creating stau particles difficult. Another kind of collider might be needed (see 鈥淧hysicists propose factory to spew out Higgs particles鈥).
Another intriguing explanation 鈥 which could account for the tau deficit and the photon excess 鈥 appeared on 5 July. and Matthew Buckley, both of Fermilab, calculate that if the superpartner of the top quark 鈥 the stop 鈥 is present when the Higgs is decaying, it will alter the decay to create both anomalies (). By contrast, a stau only explains the excess of photons. 鈥淚f you only want to introduce one new particle, stops are the only one that gets you everything you need to explain the data,鈥 Hooper says.
See graphic: 鈥淎 boson spotter鈥檚 guide鈥
A stau or a stop would be good news for finding dark matter. 鈥淚n either of these scenarios, you expect at least one superpartner that鈥檚 even lighter than the stau or stop,鈥 says Hooper. 鈥淭hat could be the dark matter.鈥
Exciting though these possibilities are, nearly everyone urges caution. 鈥淎ll of these things, they鈥檙e like pipe dreams,鈥 says of CMS. 鈥淥f course I鈥檇 like to see a difference, but if I鈥檓 honest, at the moment everything looks like the standard-model Higgs.鈥 Even if both anomalies disappear, the Higgs needn鈥檛 leave us in Weinberg鈥檚 nightmare.
鈥淓ven if both anomalies disappear, the Higgs needn鈥檛 leave us in Weinberg鈥檚 nightmare鈥
Although ATLAS and CMS had enough data to see the new boson with certainty, they haven鈥檛 yet got enough to pin down its properties. They now need to identify the particle鈥檚 spin 鈥 a quantum property a bit like the angle of a particle鈥檚 rotational axis.
The observed decay into photon pairs, combined with the fact that the particle is definitely a boson, constrain its spin to either 2 or 0. To fulfil its duty of giving other particles mass via the Higgs mechanism, the spin must be 0. Only then can the particle be the fundamental component of the non-directional, or 鈥渟calar鈥, Higgs field.
Most physicists think it will be 0, because producing a particle with a spin of 2 in a collider is harder and so less likely. However, even if it is 0 there鈥檚 yet another way it may still be non-standard, which relates to a property called parity, most easily explained via mirror images. Usually, if a particle has spin 0, its mirror image looks identical. But it is possible for a particle to be spin 0 and not have that property. Among the five Higgses in supersymmetry, one 鈥 known as a pseudoscalar 鈥 has this property.
鈥淔inding something, and it being a pseudoscalar, is right up the alley of supersymmetry,鈥 says De Roeck. Although he adds that, maddeningly, if it isn鈥檛 a pseudoscalar, that doesn鈥檛 mean supersymmetry is ruled out.
Jenni, meanwhile, bristles at the notion of a nightmare scenario, and says that finding a standard-model Higgs would be just fine. 鈥淭o find this last piece of the puzzle was one of the main goals of the LHC. We also know that the standard model does not explain it all, so I don鈥檛 think this will mean that life for the next 15 years at the LHC will be boring at all.鈥
Until next year, when it will hibernate for an upgrade, the LHC is expected to run smoothly, more than doubling the total amount of data collected. By some estimates, that could allow the tau, diphoton and spin questions to be settled within a year.
That鈥檚 good news for those of us waiting on tenterhooks to find out if we are living in a supersymmetric universe, or something even more weird and wonderful. But it鈥檚 a mixed bag for those already tired after the scramble to produce the Higgs result in time for ICHEP. 鈥淣ow all hell breaks loose,鈥 says De Roeck. 鈥淚 was thinking about taking a vacation. But now鈥︹
