杏吧原创

It’s too early to herald a US nuclear renaissance

Obama鈥檚 financial backing for nuclear power must be reinforced by tougher economic incentives and better technology

THE phrase 鈥渘uclear renaissance鈥 is greatly overused, but the US decision to resume building nuclear power plants after a 30-year hiatus might yet prove worthy of it (see 鈥US starts building first nuclear reactors in 30 years鈥).

That鈥檚 not because it will alter the energy landscape in the short term. The US government expects that nuclear power will continue to provide about between now and 2035. The new plants will simply replace the output of ageing reactors being shut down by utility companies.

Nonetheless, it鈥檚 a step in the right direction. As we recently argued (9 March, page 3), nuclear energy is uniquely useful in reducing our impact on the climate. For all its drawbacks, it is currently the only low-carbon technology that can supply stable power on a very large scale.

But the renaissance has not dawned yet. Some older nuclear plants simply can鈥檛 compete on cost with gas-fuelled rivals. Newer designs should help close the gap, but fossil fuels鈥 cost-effectiveness is driven, in part, by a licence to emit carbon dioxide. So for nuclear to gain ground, President Barack Obama will have to back up his tough talk about legislation mandating carbon cuts with economic incentives. He鈥檚 already offered a carrot, in the form of an $8.3 billion commitment to finance the nuclear plants鈥 construction; imposing financial penalties on carbon-intensive power would provide a stick.

鈥淔inance for nuclear is the carrot 鈥 penalties on carbon-emitting energy should be the stick鈥

This is unlikely to happen overnight. But even if it did, any nuclear renaissance is still likely be a long process. Today鈥檚 plants take a lot of money, time and expertise to build, limiting their deployment and diminishing their commercial appeal.

That might change in the future. The to see whether small modular reactors (SMRs), each producing about 180 megawatts (compared with 1000 megawatts from a full-sized reactor) can be made cost-effective.

If they can, SMRs could be built in factories and shipped wherever they are needed. There are obvious security concerns, but if this idea works, it really might kick off a nuclear renaissance 鈥 and one that would span the globe.

Topics: Electricity / Energy and fuels / Nuclear technology / United States