
HOSPITALS are packed full of valuable information about patients but doctors often struggle to use it effectively. A London-based start-up wants to change all that with a new suite of iPad apps called Medopad.
The idea is to link up every data-making system and machine in a hospital to a central service which can deliver a patientâs collated records â from historical medical files to X-ray and MRI scans â at the touch of a doctorâs iPad.
A number of bespoke Medopad apps help doctors manipulate and utilise this data. For example, one app broadcasts the readings from a patientâs heart monitor to their doctorâs iPad screen, so a check-up can be carried out from anywhere in the hospital building. Another app uses voice-recognition to let doctors create written notes on patients just by speaking.
Advertisement
âWe said letâs just build tiny bridges and data-mine what we need for the app to do what it needs to do,â says Medopad CEO Rashid Shahidi.
For BMI Healthcare, the UKâs largest private healthcare provider, Medopad could be about to transform how their doctors work. BMI has been piloting the software and testing integration with its hospitalsâ existing databases and is now deciding whether to roll it out for use with actual patients. âItâs intuitive, and it kind of works the way doctors think,â says group medical director, Mark Ferreira.
With Medopad in place, doctors will be able to refer cases to one another for a second opinion from within the app suite. Photos of a patientâs visible symptoms can be taken using an iPad and shared, for example. Another Medopad app features integration with the Google Glass headset, which allows up to five clinicians to collaborate in real time, take pictures and share them, and access a patientâs records simultaneously. A pathology app can even do some analytical work for doctors, with abnormal blood-test results flagged automatically.
ÂPhotos of a patientâs visible symptoms can be taken using an iPad and shared among doctorsÂ
The system has a number of security features. For example, it can be set up so that when a doctorâs device physically leaves the hospital network, patient data will no longer be available on it.
Both doctors and patients should benefit from this kind of system, says Stevan Wing, who co-hosts a podcast on medical apps called The Digital Doctor. âIf you increase the doctorâs information as well as their ability to share it with patients and make joint decisions, then I think the quality of care must improve,â he says.
Charles Lowe, president of the Telemedicine and eHealth section at the Royal Society of Medicine in London, has been following Medopadâs progress. âItâs going to speed up treatment,â he says.
Others worry that Medopadâs impact will not be of universal benefit. Carl Reynolds, CEO of Open Health Care UK, would prefer it if more software developers were commissioned to work with hospital data. That would mean that apps viewable on multiple devices could be created and that hospitals wouldnât have to buy into a single platform. Medopad will cost about ÂŁ50 to ÂŁ90 per month per user for a hospital to license.
Reynolds has created an open-source Electronic Clinical Infections Database . But support for such initiatives is often lacking. âBy embracing things like web technologies and existing, established open standards we could drive down our costs, improve interoperability and be in a much better place,â he says.
Leader: âDoctors must go digital to deliver local careâ
Google glass saved my life
The best apps are sometimes strapped to your head.
In January, surgeon Steven Horng of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston claimed that Google Glass, the wearable computer, helped save a life. While performing an operation, Horng realised he needed to know which blood-pressure drugs his patient, who suffered from allergies, could take.
It was only by quickly calling up records on Google Glass that he was able to do this in time. A handful of medical Google Glass start-ups have been launched, including Remedy, which allows a doctor to live-stream a patient meeting to a specialist when an expert opinion is required.
This article appeared in print under the headline âDigital doctorsâ