
There may be more people living into their 80s and 90s, but they could be less likely to get dementia than previous generations (Image: BSIP/UIG/Getty)
It鈥檚 one public health message that has seeped in. , an inevitable consequence of our steadily greying population.
Advertisement
Those spreading the word range from medical researchers to , and even the .
But the figures tell a different story. And this misunderstanding may be contributing to a dementia strategy that is taking a cruel toll on those affected, some doctors say.
Four out of five large studies in different European countries have now suggested that our chance of getting dementia by any particular age is less than that of previous generations.
The UK study found that this sufficiently counterbalanced the rise in the number of people living into their 80s and 90s so that the total number of people with dementia stays roughly stable.
As the Alzheimer鈥檚 Society has pointed out, that , perhaps driven by health trends such as rising rates of obesity and diabetes.
Yet even so it鈥檚 in stark contrast to the usual doom and gloom, says of the University of Cambridge, who was involved in . 鈥淭aken collectively they do seem to be pointing towards a more optimistic picture.鈥
Protect yourself early
So why has the risk of dementia decreased? There are several possible contributing factors. Our physical health has improved markedly over the past century, due to less malnutrition and infectious disease; and more recently we鈥檝e made progress to improve the health of our hearts and blood vessels, which also helps to protect the brain. In addition, we are more mentally stimulated than ever before, from childhood through to old age.
Pinning down just which of these has greatest impact could do more to prevent cases of dementia than the current focus on discovering new drugs and screening for the condition, . 鈥淲e need to work out where we get the best bang for our buck,鈥 she says.
That view is lent weight by another study out this week, which suggests there are many things that we could potentially do to .
In a reanalysis of 323 previous studies, the authors estimate that two-thirds of Alzheimer鈥檚 cases, the most common form of dementia, were attributable to nine risk factors. Some of these were things that are possible for people to change, such as smoking and having high blood pressure. Others are harder to tackle, such as low educational achievement, developing depression or ending up physically frail in later life.
On the bright side, says a doctor in Surrey, UK, it鈥檚 encouraging that many of the things we can do to reduce our dementia risk also improve our general health. 鈥淚f you look after your heart you鈥檙e looking after your brain,鈥 he says.
Diagnosis push
Brunet says efforts to improve general public health would be more useful than current moves in the UK to diagnose more people with dementia. It is estimated that over half of people with the condition are not formally diagnosed, and UK family doctors are being pushed to screen for it in older people when they attend an appointment for other reasons.
But in January the UK National Screening Committee warned that the screening test 鈥 which involves checking people鈥檚 memory 鈥 was . Typically, people with a 鈥渇alse positive鈥 diagnosis have only mild memory problems or word-finding difficulties that are not bothering them, says Brunet, and this doesn鈥檛 mean that they will go on to develop dementia.
And even those who really do have dementia probably gain little from their diagnosis, he says, seeing as there are no drug treatments that work very well. 鈥淕iving them this label has a big impact on their lives,鈥 he says. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e terrified.鈥
鈥淔or people who are seeking a diagnosis because they鈥檙e concerned about their memory, fine. But screening is a very different thing.鈥
Screening concerns
The government, for its part, says the memory tests are 鈥渃ase finding鈥 rather than screening. But Brunet and other doctors have said in the BMJ that , in that they offer health tests to people who were not seeking them. 鈥淭here鈥檚 not even informed consent,鈥 he says.
Brunet says the scheme was introduced because the government needed to be seen to be doing something. 鈥淚t鈥檚 much cheaper to [screen] than to put real money into caring for people.鈥
Brayne is equally sceptical. 鈥淭he evidence base isn鈥檛 there to say that making a diagnosis leads to better outcomes,鈥 she says. 鈥淎ttention to health in early life is probably a better investment.鈥
Journal reference: The Lancet Neurology, DOI: