
Love match: zebra finches make great parents if they get to choose their own mates (Image: blickwinkel/Alamy )
True love seems to make birds better parents. Birds that are allowed to choose their own partners are more diligent parents, according to a team who arranged 鈥渕arriages鈥 for zebra finches.
Advertisement
Zebra finches are one of many animals that pair up for life with both sharing parental duties.
Most research on how animals select their mates has focused on indicators of quality, assuming that all individuals agree what constitutes an attractive partner, with little attention paid to the reasons why individual preferences may vary. One idea is that individuals choose partners whose genes are compatible with their own. Alternatively, they may pick a mate whose behaviour is a good fit.
To test this out, researchers from the in Seewiesen, Germany, wondered what would happen if animals were matched with partners arbitrarily instead of being given free choice.
First, they organised a 鈥渟peed-dating鈥 event for their population of 160 aviary finches, allowing the birds to form pairs freely. They then paired up half the females with males they hadn鈥檛 chosen 鈥 essentially breaking up the earlier relationships.
Breeding success
The new pairs were put in individual cages for a few months to enable them to bond. Both the control group and the arranged pairs were left to breed for five months in cages shared by three pairs, while the team studied their breeding success.
The number of surviving chicks was 37 per cent higher in pairs who chose their own mate. In the arranged pairs, three times as many eggs were unfertilised, more eggs were buried or lost, and more chicks died after hatching. Males in these partnerships also attended the nest less diligently while the eggs were hatching, when chicks are most vulnerable.
Unsurprisingly perhaps, females were less willing to mate with males they hadn鈥檛 chosen, and the males were more likely to look for new partners.
The researchers also found that the death rate for embryos was the same across the two groups, suggesting that the lower egg survival rate was due to the quality of parenting, and not genetic incompatibility in the mismatched pairs.
If the birds were choosing mates for their genetic compatibility, you would expect that the embryo mortality rate would be lower in chosen pairs, as they would be more genetically compatible and therefore produce healthier embryos.
The lead author thinks reproductive success was lower among forced pairs because 鈥減sychological constraints鈥 prevented them from parenting to the best of their ability. 鈥淭hey should have worked as much as they could and raised as many chicks as they could, but they simply couldn鈥檛,鈥 she says.
Complex behaviour
Pair bonds involve immensely complicated behaviour, says , from the University of Bath, UK. Couples function well partly because they are willing to work hard to raise offspring together, but also because they may complement each other.
鈥淚f a male, let鈥檚 say, is better at defending the nest than the female, whereas females might be better at feeding the young, a successful couple might be one that splits the roles,鈥 Sz茅kely says. 鈥淪uch behavioural complementarity can maintain pair bonds, and can be the trademark of a successful family.鈥
at the University of Exeter, UK, says it wasn鈥檛 entirely clear from the study how individuals identify behavioural compatibility in prospective partners, but personality traits, such as how bold or shy an individual is, might play a role. 鈥淭he current study nicely demonstrates the importance of getting your choice of mate right first time, and that attractiveness is a relative, not absolute, concept,鈥 he says.
Journal reference: PLOS Biology ,