杏吧原创

Verse in the universe: The scientific power of poetry

Count the number of new collections and burgeoning alliances鈥攁nd it looks as if science and poetry are getting along better than ever
In their own way, poems hold a聽mirror to reality
In their own way, poems hold a聽mirror to reality
Alec Soth/Magnum

KEATS hated science, complaining that it 鈥渨ould clip an angel鈥檚 wings鈥, and that Newton had 鈥渄estroyed the poetry of the rainbow by reducing it to a prism鈥. The poet wouldn鈥檛 be impressed with today鈥檚 poetry and science love-in. For years, big-name poets like Ruth Padel, Lavinia Greenlaw and Alice Fulton have drawn on scientific ideas. Now the rise of neuroscience, in particular, seems to be attracting a new generation.

This makes sense: poetry spends a lot of time dancing around 鈥the hard problem鈥 of how the physical stimuli we are exposed to end up as the subjective experience researchers call qualia. In this respect, poetry speaks to the same urgency to know what makes us tick as neuroscience does.

Helen Mort, whose first collection was shortlisted for a number of awards, says that 鈥減oetry is particularly well placed 鈥 perhaps even uniquely placed 鈥 to represent some of these experiential aspects of qualia. The poet Michael Donaghy described a poem as a 鈥榙iagram of consciousness鈥欌 That鈥檚 a great way of putting it.鈥

Poets can also help articulate the big questions about our universe and ourselves, Mort suggests. 鈥淭he more we find out about the world, the more questions we uncover,鈥 she says.

What Keats worried about, of course, was that science would unpick the beauty of the natural world. If we came to know all about how it works, where is the space for poetry to fill?

But the reverse is true, argued Richard Dawkins in his 1998 book Unweaving the Rainbow: scientific discoveries just give us more to wonder at. Perhaps instead of ruining the illusion, science and poetry can feed off one another and act as a shortcut to the truth?

鈥淧oetry and science both seek to peer through to the underlying reality of things, pushing at the borders of imagination,鈥 agrees Sarah Howe. Her debut collection Loop of Jade has just won one of poetry鈥檚 most famous awards, the T. S. Eliot prize.

鈥淪cience and poetry can feed off one another and act as a shortcut to the truth鈥

Another route to the heart of that reality was taken by Litmus, a magazine for poems about science, in its 鈥渉aematological issue鈥 last year. Packed with stark, elliptical poems on blood, the body and the limits of medical science, its experimental poems frequently used complex scientific language.

Poetry can also tell us why we should care: the 鈥渞esponsibility to awe鈥, as poet-astronomer Rebecca Elson put it. This is something Simon Barraclough taps into with his Sunspots poems, with which he has toured the UK in his one-man show. It has Barraclough both embodying our nearest star and providing a commentary on what it has meant to us throughout history.

The relationship between poetry and science is not one way, either: scientists can benefit from grappling with new metaphors to communicate their work. For example, Barraclough鈥檚 latest collection Laboratorio is the fruit of a stint as poet-in-residence at the UK鈥檚 Mullard Space Science Laboratory, where he teased poems out of many of the researchers.

These collaborations hint at a more fundamental alliance, in terms not only of shared interests but also methods. That鈥檚 something poet Michael McKimm, who has done fieldwork with geologists, has noticed, too. As he explains: 鈥溞影稍磗 have to have great imagination, and are very creative in a practical way.鈥

Howe worked alongside the biggest name of all in 2015 when she collaborated with Stephen Hawking to create a about relativity, which he read for the UK鈥檚 National Poetry Day. It begins:

When we wake up brushed by panic in the dark

our pupils grope for the shape of things we know.

Photons loosed from slits like greyhounds at the track

reveal light鈥檚 doubleness in their cast shadows

that stripe a dimmed lab鈥檚 wall 鈥 particles no more 鈥

and with a wave bid all certainties goodbye.

During their collaboration, Hawking told Howe: 鈥淧hysicists and poets may differ in discipline, but both seek to communicate the beauty of the world around us.鈥

Dawkins would agree. As he wrote in Unweaving the Rainbow: 鈥淪cience is poetic, ought to be poetic, has much to learn from poets and should press good poetic imagery and metaphor into its inspirational service.鈥

This article appeared in print under the headline 鈥淭he power of verse鈥

Topics: Books and art