Many of the people behind the most significant medical discoveries of the past 300 years wouldn鈥檛 have got into medical school by today鈥檚 standards, because they either studied the 鈥渨rong鈥� subjects, got low grades or didn鈥檛 follow the rules.
The finding highlights how the education system wrongly favours academic achievement over other important traits, like persistence and creativity, says David Jenkins at the University of Toronto, Canada. 鈥淲e have to be much more flexible in how we accept young people into medical school or any other profession or activity that is their goal,鈥� says Jenkins.
Jenkins鈥檚 research was born out of his own frustration with being penalised because he 鈥渃ouldn鈥檛 read very quickly鈥�. He has since noticed how would-be medical students spend hours memorising passages from physics textbooks that they will never use in clinical practice.
Advertisement
To find out if this academic focus might rule out potential students who might otherwise be destined for greatness, Jenkins and his colleagues looked at the early academic achievements of 100 people considered to be among the greatest innovators in medicine.
Nobel prizewinners
The list of innovators included Edward Jenner, who discovered the world鈥檚 first vaccine 鈥� for smallpox, which has since been eradicated worldwide. Frederick Banting was another example, who conducted Nobel prizewinning research on the role that insulin can play in treating diabetes.
Specifically, the team looked at which subjects the innovators had studied at school, and their grades, as well as the comments of their teachers, and whether they had ever failed or been expelled.
鈥淲e assume all great medical innovators would certainly be accepted to medical school,鈥� says Jenkins. But his team found that, by today鈥檚 standards, only 24 per cent would meet entry requirements.
鈥淎lmost a quarter of them would not be accepted to medical school today,鈥� says Jenkins. The remaining innovators fell into a grey area, and would not be guaranteed a place, either. 鈥淭hey didn鈥檛 have the right subjects, they were not good students and they had other misdemeanours,鈥� says Jenkins. Banting, for example, only began studying medicine after a failed attempt at a divinity degree 鈥� an experience that would almost certainly rule someone ineligible to enter medical school today.
Educators need to find better ways of assessing student achievement, says Jenkins. 鈥淚 think we鈥檙e missing out on a lot of people who might have diverse ideas and come up with different solutions,鈥� he says. Rather than focusing on subjects and grades, assessors should consider how students perform in project work, he suggests.
Jacqueline Stevenson at the University of Leeds, UK, agrees that the way young people are assessed at school could be improved. 鈥淲e have an educational system in most countries that assumes that the development of things like innovation and academic ability is a linear process,鈥� she says. 鈥淸But] it鈥檚 not easy to predict what someone will be in the future just by looking at [exam results].鈥�
However, she cautions that if students were to be assessed on extracurricular activities and projects, it is vital to first ensure that these projects are accessible to all students, regardless of their background.
QJM
