
IN EARLY November, covid-19 cases in Europe were surging, accounting for almost half the worldâs new cases and deaths. Now many in the region are emerging from a second round of lockdowns, including England on 2 December and soon France on 15 December. So how well did they work, and which countries got them right?
The restrictions imposed by most European nations were âfairly highâ, says Thomas Hale at the University of Oxford, who runs a . Last week, most European nations scored more than 60 out of 100 points on the trackerâs index of the stringency of responses, with most having âstay at homeâ orders. Exceptions included the Baltic states, countries in the Balkans and Switzerland.
Advertisement
Hannah Ritchie at online publisher Our World in Data, says that most national lockdowns have already caused new cases to reach their peak.
Typically, new cases in European countries peaked one to two weeks after a lockdown started, and deaths a further one to two weeks later, says Ritchie. But some say it should take two to three weeks for an effect to be seen, .
Englandâs national lockdown, which began on 5 November, appears to have cut the virusâs prevalence by about 30 per cent, according to the being run by Imperial College London. Around 1 in 100 people were estimated to be infected, according to results from 13 to 24 November, compared with about 1 in 80 between 16 October and 2 November.
On 27 November, the UK governmentâs science advisers revised down the coronavirusâs reproduction, or R, number for England to between 0.9 and 1 â the first time since September that it may have been below 1 â indicating that the countryâs epidemic is stable or shrinking.
âWe know lockdowns work, but national-scale lockdowns are a blunt instrument. Countries that have fared better have largely managed to avoid them,â says Ritchie, citing Finland as a success story. The World Health Organization says lockdowns should be a last resort.
âMany of us in this field are frustrated that Europe is back in this situation,â says Amesh Adalja at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland. He says the sustainable alternative is effective test-and-trace systems.
â2 weeks
The amount of time before lockdown compliance fallsâ
In their absence, second lockdowns in Europe have curbed the virusâs spread. âWe can say that now, at the end of autumn, the situation is quite under control. The challenge is how much have we improved our preparedness, readiness and contingency plans to face the coming months in a safer way,â says Josep Jansa at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
One issue is that most countries allowed new cases to get too high before locking down, says Jansa. Austria, where a national lockdown didnât start until 17 November, is a case of waiting too long, says Hale. At the opposite end was Denmark, he says, which acted quickly with lockdowns in some areas from 6 November.
Cases in France were relatively slow to peak after lockdown, which Ritchie thinks is probably due to covid-19âs high prevalence in communities before the measure.
Conversely, Walesâs use of a two-week âfirebreakâ lockdown, 13 days ahead of Englandâs, caused cases to peak in about eight days, says Rob Orford, the countryâs chief scientific adviser for health. âThe models suggested we would take R below 1, and we could potentially push the epidemic back at least three weeks. And thatâs exactly what happened,â he says.
The UK governmentâs science advisers recommended a similar strategy on 21 September for England, which wasnât adopted. âIf the government had listened to SAGE back in September, we probably could have got away with a few weeks,â says Stephen Griffin at the University of Leeds, UK.
Curfew or closure?
Shorter lockdowns can help avoid public fatigue. Based on surveys and mobility data due out this week, Hale has found that compliance falls two weeks into European national lockdowns â and sharply after eight weeks.
The severity of restrictions also varied between countries. One big factor in their effectiveness appears to be whether bars and restaurants were shut or made to close early. âIt looks as if places that just close early, thatâs not particularly effective. Closing restaurants and bars does seem to slow things down,â says Christina Pagel at University College London. âNetherlands and France both tried curfews, but then moved to closure of hospitality, which flattened the curve.â
Sweden, which took a different response to most European countries in the first wave, has again held back from a national lockdown, but has imposed tougher restrictions than before, including a national ban on alcohol sales after 10 pm. âSweden is much more constrained this time. The so-called Swedish exception has been less of an exception,â says Hale.
Germany has been hit harder second time round, but its strict lockdown has kept cases at a much lower level than its neighbours, says Ritchie.
Most experts New ĐÓ°ÉÔ´´ spoke to think a third cycle of lockdowns is probable in Europe, given people mixing at Christmas. âI wouldnât say itâs inevitable,â says Hale. âBut I think that itâs more likely than not.â
Health Check newsletter
Get a weekly round-up of health news in your inbox