Lunar living
鈥淔ancy buying a house on the Moon?鈥�, an email that plops into Feedback鈥檚 inbox asks, continuing, before we have a chance to say, 鈥淣ot particularly鈥�, 鈥淚t would cost you 拢234k a MONTH!鈥�
鈥淲ith Earth becoming increasingly populated and space technology advancing, it won鈥檛 be long before lunar living becomes the new normal,鈥� this email, which appears to have come from a price comparison website, asserts. Yes, they were saying that back in 鈥�69, too.
Advertisement
Mind you, recent revelations about lunar infrastructure developments such as kilometres-high concrete towers and fully operational sperm banks (20 March) might be enough to convince us this is an idea whose time has come.
Alas, 鈥淟iving on the moon is not as simple as life on Earth鈥� 鈥� a statement Feedback would definitely describe as the under-variety. Building and transport costs, land licences and a property markup of 27.61 per cent, plus such boondoggles as solar panels, industrial-strength heaters and meteor-proof windows, mean we are looking at a surprisingly precise 拢44,525,536.42 for a first-time buy. Plus 拢1 billion for the nuclear-powered option.
What planet are they on, we can only ask. Although, considering the pre-pandemic prices of some of the real estate we see from our London penthouse stationery cupboard, the answer might well be Earth.
Lost in the post
In that pre-pandemic spirit of peering moodily into estate agents鈥� windows wondering who lives in a house like that, we find ourself moved to browse the . This is the virtual shop window of the International Lunar Lands Authority, a body tasked 鈥� by itself, we presume 鈥� 鈥渨ith administering and allocating real property located on Luna, Earth鈥檚 Moon, and registering ownership claims to properties on the Moon on behalf of individuals and business entities around the world鈥�.
Vast lava plains are very much in this season, we note, with land parcels on the hopefully named Mare Imbrium, or Sea of Rains, commanding an impressive $130.26 per acre at our time of looking (with a 35 per cent discount on 10 acres). Meanwhile, the going rate for an acre on the Sea of Tranquillity 鈥� the historic scene of the Apollo 11 landings 鈥� is just $52.61. Anticipation of just too many darn tourists blasting in and out and parking their moon buggies on the verges, we imagine.
Sad to read, though, that shipments of titles to lunar land outside the US may be subject to delays and restrictions owing to pandemic-related postal problems. Feedback considers this an unexcitingly 20th-century technology to rely on. Those in a hurry can download a PDF, but we are holding out for delivery on one of Elon Musk鈥檚 rockets, preferably one that doesn鈥檛 explode shortly after touchdown.
On second thoughts, we鈥檒l wait for the post. Even this pandemic will be over before it鈥檚 time to assert our lunar land rights.
Coming out in the wash
We are as mystified as Ros Hancock by an ad for that keeps popping up in her Facebook feed. 鈥淎ccording to experts, the rate of bacteria counts exceeding the standard for household washing machines is as high as 81.3%,鈥� it states.
We think it is trying to say that our assumption that washing machines are largely self-cleaning is invalid, perhaps by as much as 81.3 per cent. Whether we need a 鈥渢riple Active Oxygen Decontamination Complex鈥� to remove 99.9 per cent of bacteria and other pathogens lurking in the drum among our errant smalls is another matter. Another of our assumptions is that the remaining 0.1 per cent will soon reoccupy the vacated space.
Pray for a vaccine
Stuart Arnold was casting around for vaccination centres with available appointments near his home in south-west France when he happened upon one in Lourdes.
The tourism authorities might have wanted to keep that one quiet, he suggests 鈥� pilgrimages to the town for healing via other means being a thing. On the other hand, Stuart, if it works for you, how are we to tell whether it was the vaccine or St Bernadette?
Full of beans
Somehow it is always Feedback鈥檚 colleagues who are pressing the latest research on how caffeinated beverages improve productivity from their jittering hands into ours. We say 鈥渞esearch鈥�; we actually mean a PR puff dreamed up by someone with an interest in selling coffee and related products. An easy enough mistake to make in the early-morning brain fog.
As ever, though, it raises more questions than it answers. If an espresso boosts productivity by 80 per cent (an average of five standardised tasks done in an hour before drinking a shot, nine after), we are left wondering why latte drinkers could only manage two tasks in the same time frame before a caffeine infusion. Equally, we marvel at how the tip-top productivity of drinkers of Irish coffee was improved still further by a nip of the hard stuff. Well, it has been our saviour during lockdown.
Plain vanilla
Yes, that is Carolyn Beans you see writing about vanilla on page 46. Over and out.
Got a story for Feedback?
You can send stories to Feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This week鈥檚 and past Feedbacks can be seen on our website.
