ŠÓ°ÉŌ­““

Artificially stripped-back cell is still able to rapidly evolve

An artificial ā€œminimal cellā€ that has had all but the most essential genes stripped out can evolve and adapt to its surroundings just as fast as a normal cell
Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0 cells
Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0 cells
THOMAS DEERINCK, NCMIR/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

An artificial ā€œminimal cellā€ that has had all but the most essential genes stripped out can evolve just as fast as a normal cell. The finding shows that organisms can rapidly adapt, even with an unnatural genome that provides little flexibility.

ā€œIt appears there’s something about life that’s really robust,ā€ says at Indiana University in Bloomington. ā€œWe can strip it down to just the bare essentials,ā€ he says, but that doesn’t stop evolution going to work.

Lennon and his team studied a bacterium called Mycoplasma mycoides, a parasite that lives inĀ the guts of animals like cows.Ā Because it gets most ofĀ itsĀ nutrients from its host, ²Ń.Ģż³¾²ā³¦“Ǿ±»å±š²õ has naturally lostĀ aĀ lotĀ of genes.

In 2016, researchers led by Craig Venter at the in California reported that they had stripped the bacterium’s 901-gene genome back even further, to just 493 genes. The resulting synthetic organism, ²Ń.Ģż³¾²ā³¦“Ǿ±»å±š²õ JCVI-syn3B, has a ā€œminimal genomeā€, the smallest of any known free-living organism.

M. mycoides JCVI-syn3B can grow and divide normally, but Lennon wondered what would happen to it in the long term. Species need to change to survive, but it seemed likely that the minimal cell would have trouble evolving.

ā€œEvery single gene in its genome is essential,ā€ says Lennon. ā€œThe cellĀ Ā  has zero degrees of freedom.ā€ As aĀ result, any mutations that arise would be expected to be harmful.

Lennon’s team began by establishing that the minimal cellĀ could still mutate. It does so toĀ such a degree that, even given aĀ small population size of just 10Ā million, every single genetic ā€œletterā€ wouldĀ be expected to mutate more than 250Ā times overĀ 2000 generations.

The team then grew ²Ń.Ģż³¾²ā³¦“Ǿ±»å±š²õ JCVI-syn3B in the lab, allowing them to evolve freely for 300 days.

Next, the team set up some head-to-head contests. In some experiments, the minimal cells that had evolved for 300 days were pitted against the original, non-minimal ²Ń.Ģż³¾²ā³¦“Ǿ±»å±š²õ. In others, the non-minimal cells went up against minimal cells that hadn’t evolved for 300 days.

In all contests, the team put equal quantities of the strains being assessed in a container and observed which one became more common, a sign of which was better suited to its environment.

The unevolved minimal bacterium was ā€œreally sickā€, saysĀ Lennon, and was easily outcompeted by the non-minimal version. But the version that had evolved for 300Ā days did much better, recovering 80 per cent of the lost fitness (bioRxiv, ).

Crucially, the team identified the genes that changed most during these evolution contests, says at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, who wasn’t involved in the study. Some have unknown functions. ā€œYou have to go and askĀ yourself, ā€˜What does that thingĀ do?ā€™ā€Šā€ she says.

Topics: Cell biology / Evolution / Genetics