ĐÓ°ÉÔ­´´

Ig Nobel prizes 2022: The unlikely science that won this year’s awards

From how constipation affects the mating prospects of scorpions to an analysis of what makes legal documents unnecessarily difficult to understand, this year's Ig Nobel prizes, for “achievements that first make people laugh, then make them think”, are unveiled

The best (and also the non-best) science can make people laugh, then think, and every year the Ig Nobel prizes serve up some glittering specimens of this. The 32nd First Annual Ig Nobel prize ceremony – entirely online again, thanks to the pandemic – has given us this year’s new winners and, as per tradition, Feedback regifts them to you.

Surfing ducklings

There is subtle mystery in the way ducklings manage to swim in formation. Frank Fish, who is a biologist and a human being, did experiments on this in the early 1990s. He deployed an artificial “mother duck” in a flow tank, analysing the physics on display when real ducklings swam in the wake of that decoy. Fish concluded that vortices – the swirling of the water – explain much about the efficiency of swimming in formation.

A quarter of a century later, hydrodynamicist Zhiming Yuan and his colleagues developed computer models of mother and baby ducks swimming together. Yuan’s group that “wave-riding” – surfing, essentially – reveals quite a lot about the physics. Fish and Yuan’s team were jointly awarded this year’s Ig Nobel Physics prize. Together, they are a plum example of scientists finding different ways to analyse a phenomenon that is way more complex than it looks.

Those were baby mallards that Fish examined, the same species that ornithologist Kees Moeliker came across on 5 June 1995. The resulting publication, called “The first case of homosexual necrophilia in the mallard Anas platyrhynchos (Aves: Anatidae)”, earned Moeliker the 2003 Ig Nobel Biology prize.

I should be so lucky

Alessandro Pluchino, Alessio Emanuele Biondo and Andrea Rapisarda won the Ig Nobel Economics prize for explaining, mathematically, why success most often goes not to the most talented people, . Their study appeared in the journal Advances in Complex Systems. This was the second Ig Nobel awarded to Pluchino and Rapisarda. They and their colleague Cesare Garofalo won the 2010 Management prize for demonstrating mathematically that organisations would become more efficient if they promoted people at random.

Two hearts become one

The Applied Cardiology prize went to Eliska Prochazkova, Mariska Kret and their colleagues for finding evidence that when future romantic partners meet for the first time, and feel attracted to each other, their heart rates synchronise. (Kret has a history of curiosity-driven research. She was lead author of a 2016 study called “Getting to the bottom of face processing. Species-specific inversion effects for faces and behinds in humans and chimpanzees”. That paper added humanity to the chimpanzees-only research that won the 2012 Ig Nobel Anatomy prize for Frans de Waal and Jennifer Pokorny.)

Scandinavian noir

Magnus Gens created , wrote his master’s thesis about it in 2001 and has now been rewarded with the Ig Nobel Safety Engineering prize. What drove Gens? His thesis explains: “Scandinavia has a very large moose population and car-moose collision is a huge problem with many fatal outcomes.”

And the rest

Eric MartĂ­nez, Francis Mollica and Edward Gibson won the Literature prize, for analysing . They published their analysis, a carefully phrased 7000 or so words, in the journal Cognition.

The Biology prize went to Solimary García-Hernández and Glauco Machado. They studied and, if so, how. The scorpions’ plight arises when they respond to a predator’s attack by discarding their tail segments – an action called autotomy. García-Hernández and Machado explain: “After autotomy, individuals lose nearly 25% of their body mass and the last portion of the digestive tract, including the anus, which prevents defecation and leads to constipation.” Despite which, love, or whatever you call it, finds a way.

The Medicine prize went to a team who found that when patients undergo some forms of toxic chemotherapy, they suffer fewer harmful side effects : sucking on ice cubes.

The Engineering prize honoured a methodical campaign to find the most efficient way for people to use their fingers when turning a knob. The winners’ study, published in the Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, . It is called “How to use fingers during rotary control of columnar knobs”.

The Art History prize celebrated the authors of a study called “A multidisciplinary approach to ritual enema scenes on ancient Maya pottery”. Published in the Journal of Ethnopharmacology in 1986, it is perhaps the .

And then there was the Peace prize, awarded to a group for their recent paper in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. The team developed .

The ceremony ended with its usual salute: “If you didn’t win an Ig Nobel prize this year, and especially if you did, better luck next year!”

Got a story for Feedback?

You can send stories to Feedback by email at feedback@newscientist.com. Please include your home address. This week’s and past Feedbacks can be seen on our website.