杏吧原创

China鈥檚 production of staple food crops such as wheat and corn could become a net carbon sink if farmers start widely applying biochar to soil.

Instead of returning raw biomass, like straw, to the soil at the end of the growing season, farmers could take it to pyrolysis plants, where the material is heated at a very high temperature in an oxygen-free chamber to create biochar, a charcoal-like solid rich in carbon.

that applying it to soils not only locks the carbon away, but also improves the health of soil and its ability to retain water. Creating biochar also produces bio-oil 鈥� a possible substitute for petrol 鈥� and syngas 鈥� a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide that can be used to generate electricity.

at the University of Aberdeen in the UK and his colleagues assessed the potential impact of the mass application of biochar in the farming of staple crops in China.

As part of the process, they tried to design the most climate-friendly system of farming possible, combining straightforward actions like a reduction in fertiliser use with more innovative technologies like biochar.

鈥淲e鈥檝e looked at all the traditional mitigation methods, the things that we would expect farmers to do, like improving their nitrogen use efficiency, reducing over-fertilisation and all those things,鈥� he says. 鈥淲e鈥檝e said, we already know farmers can do that. But what additional things can we ask farmers to do, to get to even a lower-carbon, even to a net negative way of staple food production?鈥�

In other words, how low could emissions from China鈥檚 crop production go if 鈥渆verything and the kitchen sink鈥� was thrown at it?

The answer is very low indeed, the study suggests. Under an 鈥渋deal鈥� system described in the paper, farmers producing staple crops would apply biochar rather than biomass to their soils and take other steps to reduce methane and nitrogen pollution. Meanwhile, the electricity generated from burning syngas could be fed into power grids, displacing power generated by fossil fuels.

Taken together, these measures could turn staple crop production in China into a net carbon sink, soaking up the equivalent of 38 megatonnes of carbon dioxide every year, according to the study. It would also boost crop yields by 8 per cent and improve air quality.

鈥淚f the government of China threw its weight behind it, this could certainly make a significant contribution [to tackling climate change],鈥� says Smith.

However, this wouldn鈥檛 be a simple system to roll out. It would require building expensive pyrolysis plants in thousands of farming communities around China, which would probably require funding from the government. Farmers may also need to be subsidised to buy biochar for their land, at least for a few years until the price drops.

Meanwhile, some provinces, such as Guangdong, Guangxi, Fujian and Hainan, will still be net emitters of greenhouse gases because of high methane emissions from rice paddies in those regions. Finally, the carbon storage and crop yield benefits of using biochar might depend on soil type, a factor not assessed in this study.

鈥淭hey are on the right track,鈥� says at The James Hutton Institute in Aberdeen, UK. But he cautioned that extensive fieldwork would be necessary across a range of soil types and climatic conditions to verify the carbon sequestration benefits. 鈥淚t just needs testing across a wider range of environments,鈥� he says.

For Smith, the major barrier to rolling this system out would be the high upfront cost of building thousands of pyrolysis plants. 鈥淛ust getting started is the critical thing 鈥� that鈥檚 the make or break as to whether it will work or not,鈥� he says. But China鈥檚 centralised governance structure means a mass shift in farming practices may be possible. 鈥淚f there鈥檚 one country where it could work, I think it鈥檚 China,鈥� says Smith.

Sign up to our free Fix the Planet newsletter to get a dose of climate optimism delivered straight to your inbox, every Thursday