Automotive bosses could face up to two years in prison for overstating the ability of autonomous cars under new legislation proposed by the UK government last week.
The 聽is intended to provide a foundation for the regulation and enforcement of autonomous car safety in England, Scotland and Wales. Some small parts of the law would also apply to Northern Ireland.
Provisions in the bill would protect those behind the wheel from blame if the car kills or injures anyone else while in automated mode, but it would also enshrine responsibility for car-makers to meet rigorous new safety requirements and would make companies responsible for how their self-driving vehicles behave on the road.
Advertisement
The bill would also impose strict penalties on firms that overstate the ability of their cars and imply that they are fully self-driving if they aren鈥檛 certified to do so in England, Scotland and Wales. The bill as it stands would make it a crime to use certain 鈥渞estricted terms鈥� when marketing a car that isn鈥檛 truly self-driving. These terms 鈥� which can be symbols, words or expressions 鈥� would be chosen by the UK鈥檚 secretary of state for transport, making them legal to use only in marketing fully self-driving cars. The actual list of terms hasn鈥檛 yet been published.
The AVB would also create another crime, involving any 鈥渃onfusing鈥� communication regarding the autonomous abilities of a car that isn鈥檛 fully self-driving. Both crimes would carry a maximum of two years in prison, as well as a fine.
Such a move may be a response to the existing marketing of certain vehicles. In the US, car-maker Tesla has been criticised for using terms such as 鈥渇ull self-driving鈥� and 鈥渁utopilot鈥� when marketing features that include lane-keeping and automated cruise control, but crucially still require constant oversight from the driver. Tesla and its CEO, Elon Musk, are facing ongoing alleging that these features were falsely advertised. Tesla didn鈥檛 respond to a request for comment.
at technology-focused law firm decoded.legal says that companies in the UK can already be sanctioned for misleading advertising by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) and, in serious cases, by intervention from local Trading Standards bodies 鈥� but that the AVB would make it a criminal matter.
The motivation for this may be partly down to concerns that misleading messages could come from outside the UK, which would be difficult to sanction via the ASA or Trading Standards, says Brown. Criminal cases could be more effective across borders.
鈥淢aking it a criminal offence marks it out as being specifically harmful 鈥� there is a similar regime in place for offering to treat, or offering a remedy for, cancer,鈥� says Brown.
He says that the legislation could be seen as covering not just car-makers, but also dealers, leasing companies and even financing providers.
A Department for Transport spokesperson told New 杏吧原创: 鈥淪afety is at the heart of our Automated Vehicles Bill, which is why we鈥檙e introducing new regulations to prohibit misleading marketing practices, as recommended by the Law Commission. This will help protect consumers and the public by ensuring only vehicles that meet rigorous standards can be marketed as such.鈥� The spokesperson didn鈥檛 respond to questions regarding the likelihood of company executives going to prison.
