
There is a tendency among how-to enthusiasts to talk about creativity as if it had fixed objectives: things you know from the start will turn out to be novels, symphonies or paintings. Writers and musicians who have suffered the uncertainties of creation know that this is an unlikely prospectus. If they have to talk about it at all, they cite 鈥渁rtistic vision鈥 and leave it at that.
I think both these approaches are inadequate. Experience tells me that creativity often lies to one side of a declared aim, and 鈥渁rtistic vision鈥 is a redundant metaphor, because what we are considering has a lot to do with vision itself.
Advertisement
Aspiring writers are tempted by the idea that they can identify a template and knock out a thriller. Positions are adopted: 鈥渟tory鈥 is three acts and a cast of characters. Well, maybe so, but only because centuries of artistic evolution have slowly produced forms like the novel. But novels aren鈥檛 jelly moulds. And Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart didn鈥檛 write his music in something called 鈥渟onata form鈥. These terms come later, after the job is done. The problem becomes clear when you start work, creatively, because the need to believe in a guaranteed objective gets its hooks into you as soon as you encounter difficulties.
Neuroscientists call this need the Einstellung or set effect. (Einstellung is German for 鈥渁ttitude鈥.) It finds that a general tendency exists to favour known methods in problem-solving at the expense of alternatives, even when we think we are looking for them. It has been , but if you have ever tried a key in a lock and discovered that, though there are other keys to be tried, you prefer to keep jiggling the one that doesn鈥檛 fit, then you have demonstrated this tendency.
The Einstellung effect is also a good way of describing what can happen when an artistic approach stops producing results. A few years ago, when I finished Murmur, a novel about Alan Turing, I knew I wouldn鈥檛 be working that way 鈥 intensively, sequentially 鈥 again. Nevertheless, I tried a second historical fiction about ancient Britain and then one about silent cinema. Neither took. Meanwhile, I was playing the piano and composing on the side, and that was ticking along nicely.
The side-long view is important. When Mozart and Ludwig van Beethoven spoke of apprehending their musical compositions visually, they weren鈥檛 being poetic. They were describing their navigation through complex territory. The world about us offers some parallels. Some birds rely less on an internalised map of the world to locate food than on what they see when they are moving. When a bee flies sideways, generating motion parallax, the location of a flower is revealed as much by that motion as by the flower itself. (We use motion parallax, too: look to one side when you are cycling, and you will see the pavement moving by in a blur, while the houses behind it are sharper.)
Here鈥檚 Beethoven, in 1822, on writing a new piece: 鈥淚 begin to elaborate the work in its breadth, its narrowness, its height and its depth鈥 It rises, it grows up, I hear and see the image from every angle鈥 I work at several things at the same time.鈥 In other words, it is his mobile consideration of the work 鈥 seeing it move, moving around it 鈥渇rom every angle鈥, like a bee 鈥 that reveals its nature, not any kind of pre-set appearance.
Perhaps artistic vision is a part of physical seeing, in which our expectations for a work are not as important as the work鈥檚 rising shape; where motion parallax and peripheral awareness, looking away or sideways, matter more than locked-on focus. The artist鈥檚 need to discover the properties of a new work is an extension of the brain鈥檚 need to stabilise new stimuli. Creative projects and artistic vision are a part of our animal response to the world, and this is always dynamic, not fixed.
Will Eaves is an author and musician. His latest books are The Point of Distraction and Invasion of the Polyhedrons